Video
Loading video...

🔍 Review

A systematic review of responsiveness to develop future research agenda: a TCCM and bibliometric analysis

July 24, 2020 101 citations 🔒 Closed Benchmarking An International Journal
101
Citations
4
Authors
163
References
1
Countries
Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to epistemologically extend and explore the present theories from prior research conducted in the area of responsiveness. Furthermore, it determines to benchmark the prominent theories, characteristics, context and methodologies (TCCM) used in the domain since its inception to advance the science and practice of marketing and logistics discipline. Design/methodology/approach A seven-step methodology (SSM) has been introduced to create a comprehensive dataset. Based upon the selection criteria of high-ranked journals and language, the research studies have been retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, Business Source Complete and journal homepage to avoid the error of exclusion. Moreover, the dataset has been compiled using manual and electronic searches without any limitation of time. Findings The search for a suitable dataset retrieved 642 documents by identifying “1969” as the beginning year of research in the subject domain. The analysis found that responsiveness has been prominently studied in the manufacturing industry. The results also advocate responsiveness as the vital antecedent to performance and satisfaction. Frameworks have been proposed with significant propositions for future empirical testing and theory inventiveness by researchers. Originality/value The study pioneers its utility for retailers to recognize the firms' inherent abilities and strengths, which can be promoted to create responsiveness more than ever. The analysis results can act as the compelling force to understand the driving power of various factors influencing responsiveness.

Publication Details
TypeReview
PublishedJuly 24, 2020
Source Benchmarking An International Journal
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited
Volume/Issue Vol. 27 , Issue 9 , pp. 2649-2677
DOI 10.1108/bij-12-2019-0539
OpenAlex ID W3045816990
Open AccessClosed Access